« Blogging 101 - CEOs in Blogland | Main | Ten Thousand To Four Hundred »
February 22, 2006
HA HA
By QBlog in Miscellaneous
The Qrush Blog appears to be no more.
To quote Nelson from The Simpsons, "Ha ha!"
UPDATE: Well the site is back. I swear it was down while I was checking it at lunch. Still a pretty lame site. I've been hearing rumors Qrush is Rich Florence, Billy Florence's son. Reader feedback on the AmQuix site describes Rich Florence as a "high school dropout."
Rich is a high school dropout who's never worked anywhere but for his father. He's achieved the Gold Producer level but regularly does meetings such as opportunity meetings, net-sems and mini rallies. Normally a person at that level is hardly allowed on a stage.
I have no way to verify the veracity of those claims but it would explain the seeming chummy connection between Qrush and Billy Florence.
UPDATE II: Billy Florence responded to an email I sent him asking for the identity of those responsible for the Qrush blog. Here's what I sent:
Hi Billy,
It's come to my attention that your son, Rich Florence, may be responsible for the Qrush blog. Would you either confirm or deny this? The latest attacks on the blog are especially troubling and it is common knowledge that someone (possibly you or the IBOAI) funded advertising for the blog when it first began. If your son is not responsible for the blog, do you know who is behind it? Any insight on this matter would be most appreciated.
Thanks,
Eric
Here's his response which came surrounded by quotes:
"I have no idea whatsoever who runs or finances the Qrush blog and would appreciate anything you can do to ensure that neither my name nor my son's is falsely linked with the site , to include removing any such information you currently have on your site ."
Thanks,
Billy Florence
Let the record show that Billy Florence denies any involvement with the Qrush blog whatsoever.
Comments
Love that Nelson Muntz from the Simpsons!
Ha-ha!
What do you mean? There is a February 20, 2006 post.
Yep, he's still there.
What a lose wad. I think I'm going to link to him in case anyone wishes to get a feel for the leadership in Quixtar.
He's a joke. At least Larsen can admit the truth.
Haven't seen much of the truth from any tools kingpins or QRush.
Yep. I think I'll link to his site. The more that see this horse's ass the better.
What I find most interesting about the Qrush blog is that, unlike this and many other balanced or anti-quixtar blogs, there is NO opportunity to leave comments on the Qrush blog. Gee, could that be because they don't want people posting the ugly truth about Quixtar?
caj11,
I agree, I would like to see Qrush's take on the tool scam, and how much of the lying coward "kingpin" (Emerald and above) wealth is in the form of tool profits, versus A/Q profits.
I think a 9th grade education explains a whole bunch about QRush, if it is true.
Here I thought Qrush was mildly retarded.
Huh! Who knew?
What's ironic is...QBlog, PW, Scott Larsen, all known and accessible. All Quixtar leaders, hiding.
Shouldn't it be other way around? A legal / ethical business leaders more open and candid, allowing comments on their blogs and critics being anonymous?
That alone, tells a LOT.
Also, name one critic website / blog that doesn't take comment. One!!!
www.amquix.info. He only posts e-mails after getting them, not directly to site. He could easily alter/not post some he gets.
There's already 10 comments more than is warranted for a tool like Qrush. Maybe if we ignore him, he will go away again like last time.
www.amquix.info really isn't a blog and it doesn't have the format where you would post like this website. On the other hand this website, Qrushed, Quixtarinandout and other blogs do enable you to put in your comments but Qrush does not. The anti-Quixtar movement has plently of websites anyway where pro-Quixtar people can insult us by posting a comment; where is there a pro-Quxitar website where the anti-Quixtar movement can post their comments? Not on Qrush or anywhere else. So all we can do is defend our home turf while the small but vocal pro-Quixtar movement can keep slander us both on websites like this one and on their own (offensive and defensive moves).
Waymee - if he's son of Billy Florence, it is worth talking ;)
BTW billy and his wife white, Rich is black? Interesting.....
Imran,
What, who said Rich is Black?
Me. Duh???
Imran
I was in Billy's group and saw him and the rest of his family on several occasions and they are all White. There are several financial horror stories in that group including my own.
Eric
Imran,
I thought when you said "Rich is black", you meant one of Billy's sons. What did you mean?
We also were in the Florence organization years ago and have our own financial horror story. That's beside the point-- at the time we were in, the Florence children were all being homeschooled. Some of their tutors were in the organization.
Sometimes, on slow Fridays, the Mayor's Office turns to Quixtar websites for some laughs. The research assistants found this one line from Qrush's blog most funny:
"Consider me a cross between Rush Limbaugh and Quixtar's Rich DeVos. "
Said one research assistant: "You're old, drug-addled, and deaf?"
Chimed in another: "You're old and know nothing about football?"
The new hire scored some points with this one: "You're Republican and you're facing jailtime?"
Oh, those kids have all the fun.
Tex, based on my guess, Crush is black. But I could be very wrong.
There are some things, e.g. "Pinko" word is very popular among blacks in my neighbor. No one else uses it (or I haven't heard of).
Again, it could be Rich Florence, who knows. Now ppl are talking, may be he'll reveal himself.
I don't expect that Qrush will ever admit who he is. He's probably many people anyway. It's the Kingpins way of trying to confuse the issues and drag anyone through the mud that stand in the way of their system profits.
If Amquix really was a good business opportunity, the facts laid out would show that and Billy Florence and every other diamonds would be on this blog openly communicating that. Instaed, they hide and send in hired guns to do their dirty work.
The amquix business thrives on illusions of success rather than realities of it. Why should their debates be any different?
??? Just checked the link. It looks like it's still active to me. Last updated on the 20th.
Is there something I'm missing?
Posted by: Croaker | February 22, 2006 8:15 PM