« A New Amway in China? | Main | Server Maintenance »
October 28, 2005
Quixtar Related?
By QBlog in Miscellaneous
Hey there Quixtar employees. Yes, I'm talking to you. Don't be afraid, I promise I won't bite... much. ;o)
Listen. I found a website called Emerald Passport EPI and I'm wondering if it's related to Quixtar, your employer? It's confusing because the site has the Quixtar logo on it a couple of times. And it also includes a quote (and audio) from Andrew M.
In The Last 9 Months (Jan 7/05) I've Made Over $105,000 With Emerald Passport & The Profit Masters Team.
There's also this neat little link at the bottom of the page directing non-IBOs to contact a Quixtar IBO in your area. That's neat because it's a shorter form than the official Quixtar IBO Contact Page. Or maybe they're both official.
I can't find any disclaimers on the Emerald Passport site so maybe it's Quixtar kosher? I'm sure Ron Mitchell wouldn't let a site stay on the Web if he had a problem with it. Just ask Peter Salzman.
UPDATE (Nov. 2, 2005): All the Quixtar references are gone. The logo is gone. The word "Quixtar" is gone. The link to contact an IBO in your area is gone. Good work Quixtar. Glad to help!
Comments
"Quixtar Blog tries to maintain an objective perspective of the business and the people associated with the business."
Just passing by...
It's funny you say this when this blog is so obviously against Quixtar. There's nothing wrong with being against Quixtar, but at least be honest you're against it instead of claiming your site is trying to be unbiased.
I don't think any business should be blamed when bad people use it to hurt others. It's not Quixtar's fault if bad people use it to take advantage of others, just like it's not a Church's fault if the pastor steals tithe money.
Observer> "Quixtar Blog tries to maintain an objective perspective of the business and the people associated with the business."
Joe> The fact that you can post for or against quixtarshows that the site is indeed unbiased. Sure there may be more anti quixtar visitors here, but that's another topic.
Not Q* related.
Can't believe Rom Mitchell and team haven't brought this one down yet.
Although, he may not be able to...those running it may not be Q* IBOs, but just marketing to them. In that case, Legal would need to demand the trademark be removed.
Posted by: SeeSpray | October 30, 2005 10:23 PM