« + In my opinion this can be a good business | Main | - Originally posted by QuixtarBoi »
September 9, 2004
The Diamond Secret?
By QBlog in
Could I have found the "secret source" for the money that funds the coveted "Quixtar Diamond Lifestyle?"
;o)
Comments
I don't know who you are but there's a wonderful "debate structure" on my site called a FORUM. It's linked on every page of this blog. Go visit, register and start debating.
:0)
I don't want to mix with everyone else and get the same old, same old...on some obscure message board.
Let's debate front and centre on your site....I'd love to see Qrush in here too.
Picture the parties involved....
Qrush seems more and more to me like someone who has been paid by a Diamond to do some dirty work.
You seem to have a slant toward the negative.
I'm probably the most neutral guy here.
Hell, bring good ole' Bo Short into it
.....A nice public debate for everyone to see.
Or am I wasting my time here?
Click on the forum link at the top of this page. As a matter of fact, Bo made a post there today.
Come join us.
"Obscure message board?" Pardon? If the message board is obscure then this blog surely qualifies as obscure. I followed up on your invitation, went to your blog and agreed to see what was going on. Didn't appear to be much to debate but I'll continue to check in.
You may be wasting your time here because I really don't know what you're talking about. Name the three people who are most responsible for the blogging technology, in your opinion.
Hey there,
It's great to get a response from you. I'll tell you what...your forum is a great idea. I like it. However, it's the equivalent of walking into a school, finding a room amongst many, and chatting with whoever is in that particular room. Your home page is where I want to debate with others. "Right in the main lobby of the school" if you catch my drift.
I got an invitation by "Ty". Is this the TY who owns the Passport business? Is he going to trash a business and try to lure me into another? he he. Not interested in going into one of those rooms after checking it out briefly.
Anyways, you seem to have a blog that many people tend to go to. Obscure? yes! in the realm of the net, you are just as obscure as everyone. At the same time, you do have a bit of a following. It says a lot about your writing, etc. Not that I agree with you on a lot, but you are very talented.
Anyways......
What do I want? I want to have some of the other parties involved in stirring the pot with regards to Quixtar to meet in some sort of public forum. An open debate on the home page of a frequently visited site.
Since you, Larson, Short, and Qrush seem to have some of the most interesting views, then I'd like to see a debate that everone would have access to viewing. It would be very interesting. I also think getting the varying views on various topics in one concise package for people to view and ponder would be the ultimate goal of mine. There is nothing worse than seeing someone's gazillion posts, without a smidgeon of constructive feedback, and then going to the opposite side and getting the same thing. How about one balanced debate within a timeframe, where a guy like Bo or Qrush does not have an opportunity to ponder what they are going to write and spruce it up manipulatively.
If you are not interested, then great. All the best in whatever you are trying to do. I'll move on and invest my time elsewhere and drift right out of the picture.
However, I think we would be missing a great opportunity here.
You didn't answer my question. If you want to debate something, you're off to a bad start.
"Truthseeker"-
I don't know you but what the heck makes you think your opinion is more valuable than anyone else's?
Frankly, I enjoy reading Qblog's writings because I understand where he's coming from and can relate to alot of what he says.
When I want to see other viewpoints, I go to the forum and I try to contribute a little bit and then I receive feedback. I don't control who gives me the feedback.
To use your analogy, you've walked into the principle's office at 'the school' and demanded to be the captain of the debate team yet no one has even heard you speak before.
I've "heard him speak." It's underwhelming, to put it mildly.
That's why he won't venture into the forum. He's just here to complain, not confront any actual issue. If it were otherwise, he'd come on to the forum and debate.
Truthseeker, you said:
"What do I want? I want to have some of the other parties involved in stirring the pot with regards to Quixtar to meet in some sort of public forum."
THat's kind of why I setup WhatAboutQuixtar.com. But no one from the Quixtar Defense Team has signed up yet. If Qrush would join up, I'd create a forum where only QBlog and Qrush (or Bo or whomever) would be the only ones allowed to post in it. I am definately "more obscure" on the web...but both Qrush and Alticor know I am there.
Best of luck in your quest.
I'm with LawDawg and QBlog on this. "Truthseeker" seems a little suspect to me and familiar on some level.
I've just started to post on the Blogs in the last few weeks and find it fun. The posts are surprisingly informative and helpful to getting questions answered and finding 'truth'.
However, let us remember that everyone's 'truth' that they are seeking is subject to what angle you are looking at it from.
What on earth is preventing Truthseeker from doing this himself?
...speaking of 'without a smidgeon of constructive feedback'...
But Roger, TruthSeeker thinks Forums are stupid (paraphrasing) and obscure. ;o)
If you do set such a forum up with just me and Qrush, I'll gladly participate. I think that would be fun.
Also, why can't we do this on TruthSeeker's blog? He (assuming he's a he) started http://truthseeker2.blogspot.com/ and invited me and Qrush to comment. I commented but haven't seen QRush show up. Wonder why? Anyway, I'll be glad to "debate" there.
Well QBlog,
the offer is out there. If Qrush contacts me and says the Q vs Q debate will happen, I will gladly setup a forum for the two of you to debate in.
Qblog said:
I don't know who you are but there's a wonderful "debate structure" on my site called a FORUM.
I think he wants to be able to like blog on your blog... or something. Because he keeps making reference to using the "front page" of the site. This guy is redundant, and honestly he makes no sense. It's almost as if he doesn't understand the premise or the technology behind a forum, or a blog for that matter.
After visiting Truthseeker's site, I now understand why he came here to emit a piercing whine about why no one wants to play with him.
Are all MLMers automatically programmed to ride on other’s coat-tails? Last time I checked, Qblog was not his upline.
So no one here does windows?
PW
I think we just had our first "death" in the Blog Wars.... TruthSeeker's site is gone. He claimed to be an active IBO...maybe the upline told him drop it or else?
Or as some people here are suggesting, it was a suspicious site brought into this discussion under suspicious ways. He didn;t answer QBlogs questions, wanted soemthing on "the frontpage" of the site, not in the forums....dirst post claimed not to be Qrush....
I went ot his site, seemed a little to zealous as an IBO to trash the "system". even Dave Robison, a non-BSM IBO, focuses on doing it without BSM...not necessarily trashing it...just the fact that they aren't needed.
But Truthseeker's site is gone, I can't get to it...blogger keeps giving me "40 - NOT FOUND" errors.
Truthseeker....ARE YOU STILL OUT THERE??
Hey....
Why don't you post some some sort of debate structure on your site. I'd like to chat with you and fellow Q-hypes and ex-IBO's.
Tapes/Books?functions? as the first topic?
I'd like to hear your views.
I hope you don't think I am Qrush...he he he
Posted by: Truthseeker | September 9, 2004 9:21 PM