« Quixtar Average Income | Main | - Amway = Evil »
July 12, 2004
Monday Reader Mail: 4
By QBlog in Reader Mail
Today's reader mail is a classic because it exhibits many of the classic arguments used to discredit people like me. We see the "only losers complain" logic followed with the direct insults and then suggestion of a threat. It really flows quite well and is so similar to many other emails I've received that I'm beginning to suspect that there's some sort of IBO response template that everyone is passing around and copying. You never know.
As always, my comments are in bold.
name: Angela P-K
date: February 18, 2004
message: I am so glad that you have stated that this information is "just one man's perceptions". Obviously, you weren't very successful at Quixtar or you wouldn't be complaining.That's interesting logic. Here are some other "complainers" that probably weren't successful: AARP. NRA. PETA. Rutherford Institute. Martin Luther King Jr. Ralph Nader. Gee, so much complaining.
I am also glad you aren't an attorney (thank God).
Yes, I do thank God every day that I'm not some blood-sucking, soulless lawyer.
You obviously need to take a few business law classes so you can get a better idea of the law of which you claim to know so little about.
Also, you claim that a "moron" tried to send you a donation. Honestly, you would have to be a "moron" to want to make one.
You must be referring to Gerald J. Reardon who, to my knowledge, did not try to send a donation of any kind but sent me his unsolicited credit card information without comment. Mr. Reardon is obviously a moron and has been reported to the proper authorities.
You are obviously the one who has some issues and too much free time and need to "consult a psychiatrist" yourself.
Perhaps if you spent as much effort doing something constructive, you wouldn't be in the self-proclaimed present financial condition.
As far as the law is concerned. I hope you are documenting the "donations" the morons are sending to you. I would hate for you to get audited.
Bring on the audits baby! And speaking of audits, I wonder how well the average IBO would fare if they were audited. Something to think about.
Of course, this is only the opinion of a current IBO and PhD student who is actually successful and can fully comprehend legalease and the finer points of what it means to live in as a Republican in a capitalistic society.
Maybe you should take a refresher course on spelling. It's "legalese" not "legalease."
Comments
And, the authod is a PhD student!!! How impressive!!!
Aw Qblog, you got her all wrong. She is really concerned about you. She doesn't want you to be a lawyer, she thinks you should go back to school, and she hopes you don't get audited. She also wants you to do things that are more constructive. Those are words of kindness and caring. And aren't kindness and caring what Quixtar is all about?
I think it's her race, actually. the Phdians are quite a zany peoples. Speculation states it's their climate. Living conditions aren't exactly luxurious on Phdia.
I wonder what the "P-K" stands for - pre kindergartner maybe?
QBlog, keep up the good work. You're sight here is full of very informative and non-biased information on the mlm industry; as well as very colorful insights by yourself and the other members as to the pros and cons of not only mlm, but other societal issues as well.
MY ONLY complaint about you is that you take so damned long to make a move in our chess game!!!! LOL
"Of course, this is only the opinion of a current IBO and PhD student who is actually successful and can fully comprehend legalease and the finer points of what it means to live in as a Republican in a capitalistic society."
At what are you "actually successful"?
How do you measure success?
You're the one who wanted to play a 14 day per move game!!! ;o)
This kind of stuff is really scary.
It would be a cheap thrill to dissect the spelling errors, tortured grammar and twisted logic written by someone who is (allegedly) a doctoral candidate, but the thing that really strikes me is the vehemence expressed in this and some of the other 'pro' feedback I've read.
I don't understand how reading contradictory comments to a tightly held opinion can raise such ire, especially on the web. This is not a heated disagreement with a family member about something genuinely important to daily life. It's not life or death, it's not politics that could decide the fate of the world. If Angela likes AmQuix and wants to pursue it, nobody is standing in her way.
Why, then, the disproportionate hostility?
Sounds more like a meth junky about to be thrown into rehab, defending or denying his problem.
The analogy is perhaps more apt than one would want to believe.
Yes, Phd=Piled high and deeper!! Just like her rhetoric. (Oops I almost misspelled retoric)!!
She is to be pitied more than anything. And that's all I have to say about that.
Hmm, a PHD student? Hmmm. The last few times I've listened to "training" tapes they implied that going to school wasn't needed, in fact would not get you much of anything when compared to Quixtar success.
If this person is truly successful and believes fully in success at Quixtar, shouldn't she drop out of school, after all that PHD won't do much for her if the training material is to be believed.
Seems like the system is working on this person.
Don't be too hard on these people their just doing what they have been brainwashed to say!
Go get her lawdawg
Posted by: ex-dd | July 12, 2004 12:32 PM