« Quixtar IBOs Meetup | Main | Mommy and Daddy have been busy »
January 22, 2004
What's good for the goose...
By QBlog in
I've heard quite a few Quixtar IBOs, as well as our own upline (when my wife was in the biz) disparage Web info and strongly advise that we avoid the Web as a source of Quixtar Info. However, as one observant Web surfer opined, many of those very Quixtar leaders are themselves searching the Web and reading info and commentary about Quixtar.
Interesting how the big boys tell you to stay off these boards, but they obviously montitor them and sick their scary attorneys on you! Shame on them!So, what's good for the goose is obviously NOT good for the gander... whatever the hell that means. What exactly is a gander? No fair looking it up.
- C (camrynn at chartermi dot net)
Comments
I have found it interesting lately that many institutions lately have being exposed to hidden deceit, abuses, etc. The Catholic church with the sexual abuse being hidden in many cases by higher ups in the Diocese. Enron...need I say more there. Rush Limbaugh isn't an instition, but who would've guessed that talking for three hours a day, everyday, he was geeked on pills. I don't particularly care for the Catholic religion, not into repeated rituals that become routine. I definitely could not stand Rush Limbaugh, I knew something was just ridiculous there.
Where am I going with this? I lost interest in Quixtar promoter groups and look at all I have found of other peoples' experiences with the abuses of uplines. I hope there are some honest Quixtar promoters out there who aren't leading people by their noses, their dreams to buy into their tapespeak, tapes and costly functions that say the same thing over and over. I couldn't imagine spending the rest of my life in a hotel ballroom or stadium hearing speakers poo-poo jobs, daycare, gays and doing anything that takes away from the business.
Geeking on pills? Please. You just lost the last vestige of credibility you had.
But it was bound to happen so, fneh.
Well to me he was a geek, so to me he was geeking on pills!
Seriously, if it isn't geeking then what is it? I'm not up on the drug scene terms.
I don't know? His pill-taking had nothing to do with his performance on the radio aside from his hearing. So if you absolutely must make it an issue, then I suppose he was deafening on pills.
Hmmpf.
A gander is a male goose, and no, I didn't have to look it up.
Posted by: dmm | January 23, 2004 9:05 AM